top of page

Concussion Screening After a Car Accident

Writer: Mark Mulak DC DACBSP DACRB DAIPM RMSK ICSC
Mark Mulak DC DACBSP DACRB DAIPM RMSK ICSC
11 minutes ago
5 min read

A rear-end collision can produce concussion-related symptoms even when there was no direct blow to the head, no loss of consciousness, and little visible vehicle damage. That is why concussion screening should be considered when an accident victim reports headaches, dizziness, nausea, visual strain, confusion, sleep disruption, sensitivity to light or noise, or a sense that they are simply not functioning normally.

For patients, a proper evaluation creates a clearer path to care. For attorneys, it establishes a contemporaneous clinical record that distinguishes reported symptoms from measurable functional findings. In a personal injury case, that distinction matters.

Why Concussion Symptoms Are Missed After Collisions

Many people leave the scene of a collision focused on neck pain, back pain, vehicle damage, and insurance calls. Adrenaline can temporarily mask symptoms. Hours or days later, a patient may develop headache, difficulty concentrating, motion sensitivity, fatigue, irritability, or dizziness when turning the head or walking through a busy store.

These symptoms can overlap with cervical injury, vestibular dysfunction, medication effects, anxiety, sleep loss, and preexisting conditions. A symptom checklist alone cannot reliably sort out those possibilities. It is useful, but it is not the whole examination.

Concussion is a clinical diagnosis based on the mechanism of injury, symptom pattern, examination findings, and the exclusion of more urgent conditions. There is no single office test that proves every concussion, and a normal CT scan does not rule out a concussion. CT imaging is primarily used to identify potentially life-threatening bleeding or fracture when emergency criteria are present.

The practical question after a motor vehicle collision is not merely, “Did the patient hit their head?” It is whether the collision produced a force and symptom pattern consistent with brain, vestibular, visual, cervical, or combined injury - and whether the resulting deficits can be identified, documented, and monitored.

What a Defensible Concussion Screening Includes

A meaningful screening process begins with a detailed history. The clinician should document the crash dynamics, including direction of impact, restraint use, airbag deployment, head position, immediate symptoms, loss or alteration of consciousness, memory gaps, and the timing of symptom onset. Prior concussions, migraine history, learning conditions, mental health history, medications, and prior neck injuries also affect interpretation.

The next step is a focused neurologic and functional examination. This commonly includes orientation, memory, attention, speech, coordination, eye movement, pupil response, gait, and cervical assessment. The goal is not to generate an impressive list of tests. It is to determine which systems are functioning abnormally and whether the patient requires emergency escalation, conservative care, specialty referral, or additional imaging.

Vision and oculomotor assessment

Visual processing is frequently affected after concussion. Patients may report blurred vision, eye fatigue, difficulty reading, headache with screen use, or nausea in visually busy environments. Objective assessment may examine smooth pursuit, saccades, gaze stability, convergence, and the ability to maintain visual fixation during head movement.

Computerized vision tracking can add measurable data to the record when clinically indicated. Rather than relying only on a patient’s description of “feeling off,” this type of assessment can identify abnormalities in eye movement performance, visual tracking, or symptom provocation. Results must still be interpreted in clinical context, but objective data can establish a useful baseline and help monitor change over time.

Balance and vestibular assessment

Dizziness after a crash is not automatically a concussion symptom. It may arise from vestibular injury, benign positional vertigo, cervical dysfunction, medication effects, or other causes. A structured balance and vestibular assessment helps narrow the clinical picture.

Static and dynamic balance testing may reveal reduced postural control that is not obvious during a brief walk across an exam room. Testing can also evaluate whether visual input, head motion, or changes in surface stability provoke symptoms. When findings suggest vestibular involvement, referral or targeted rehabilitation may be appropriate.

Cognitive and symptom assessment

Brief cognitive screening can assess attention, recall, processing speed, and concentration. It is particularly useful when a patient describes forgetting conversations, losing track of tasks, or struggling to sustain focus at work. However, cognitive results are influenced by fatigue, pain, stress, education, language, and baseline ability. They should never be presented as a standalone measure of causation.

Symptom inventories remain valuable because they show severity, frequency, triggers, and functional impact. A patient who experiences mild headache only after prolonged screen exposure presents differently from a patient with daily dizziness, marked light sensitivity, slowed thinking, and inability to tolerate driving. Good records capture that difference in specific, functional terms.

When Emergency Evaluation Cannot Wait

Concussion screening in an outpatient setting is not a substitute for emergency care when red flags are present. Immediate emergency evaluation is warranted for worsening or severe headache, repeated vomiting, seizure, increasing confusion, fainting, slurred speech, weakness or numbness, unequal pupils, severe neck pain, new loss of coordination, or declining level of consciousness.

Patients taking anticoagulant medication, older adults, and people with a known bleeding disorder may require a lower threshold for emergency assessment after head trauma. The same is true when symptoms worsen rather than stabilize. A careful provider documents the red flags reviewed, the patient’s presentation, and the reason for referral when escalation is necessary.

The Cervical Spine Must Be Evaluated Too

After a motor vehicle collision, concussion-like symptoms and neck injury often occur together. Cervical acceleration-deceleration trauma can contribute to headache, dizziness, visual discomfort, impaired concentration, and motion sensitivity. A patient may have both a concussion and a cervical injury, or symptoms may be driven primarily by one system.

This is why a brain-focused screen without a cervical examination can leave important questions unanswered. Assessment should consider neck range of motion, muscle guarding, neurologic findings, radicular symptoms, headache referral patterns, and evidence of ligamentous or other structural injury when indicated.

Objective injury evaluation may include digital radiographic mensuration, balance testing, computerized visual assessment, and other clinically appropriate procedures. Each tool has limits. No measurement should be treated as a shortcut around clinical reasoning. Used properly, however, objective findings can support a more complete explanation of impairment than a symptom report alone.

Why Documentation Quality Matters in a Personal Injury Claim

In a legal setting, vague phrases such as “possible concussion” or “patient feels dizzy” are rarely enough. A defensible record identifies the mechanism of injury, the onset and progression of symptoms, relevant prior history, examination findings, test conditions, clinical impressions, treatment recommendations, referrals, and the patient’s functional restrictions.

Timing is especially significant. An examination performed close to the collision can preserve a more accurate account of symptoms and early functional deficits. Delayed care does not mean an injury is not real, particularly because concussion and whiplash symptoms may emerge after the acute stress response fades. But delayed presentation can create avoidable ambiguity about symptom progression and intervening events.

For attorneys, prompt narrative reporting should reflect what the provider actually observed and measured. It should not overstate causation or imply that a test alone proves a concussion. Strong medical-legal documentation explains the reasoning: the reported crash forces, the temporal relationship of symptoms, objective findings, differential considerations, and the basis for treatment or referral.

At Cityside Chiropractic, accident evaluations are structured around this distinction between subjective complaint and objective clinical evidence. The purpose is not to force every symptom into a concussion diagnosis. It is to identify the injury pattern accurately, address the patient’s functional limitations, and create records capable of professional scrutiny.

What Patients Should Do After Screening

The next step depends on the findings. Some patients need emergency imaging or neurological evaluation. Others benefit from a period of symptom-limited activity, targeted vestibular or visual rehabilitation, cervical treatment, headache management, workplace modifications, or graded return to driving and exercise. Complete inactivity for prolonged periods is not always the answer; appropriate recovery plans are individualized and should account for symptom response.

Patients should also avoid minimizing symptoms to return to work or caregiving responsibilities too quickly. At the same time, they should avoid assuming every headache or dizzy spell has one cause. Accurate reporting gives the treating clinician the best chance to identify patterns, make appropriate referrals, and document the real impact of the injury.

If symptoms follow a collision, timely concussion screening is not about creating a label. It is about establishing what has changed, what can be measured, and what care is needed to move forward safely.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page